bawad Says:

Apr 15, 2008 - That's very ignorant of you to say that. How are they any different from the hundreds of empires that came before them and came/will come after them?

sioc88 Says:

Apr 21, 2008 - and thank you for your oddly cute grammer and smiley face :P

EphesianShade Says:

Apr 22, 2008 - This is very interesting. I've never seen a WWII video on the fighting in the Balkans before.

shermitt Says:

Apr 23, 2008 - Tim Piggot Smith from Battlefield series one was much better than whoever narrated series two.

KL8932 Says:

May 4, 2008 - Great video Both the Battlefields are awesome

FatherJudgement Says:

May 10, 2008 - Awesome as always my friend thanks for the continued education....5 Stars on every video..

fw1339 Says:

May 10, 2008 - battfield 1 all series is best war documents all the world!

alexhaas Says:

May 12, 2008 - wait weren't the turks fighting in the balkans?

alexhaas Says:

May 12, 2008 - ohh wait this is WW2 xD i thought balkans of WW1 =D

Clausewitzz Says:

May 25, 2008 - In WW2 the Turks slowly went closer to the Axis side when they were making victory, when the Axis were no longer making victory they slowly went to the Allies.And somewhere close to the end of WW2 they also joined the Allies i believe.But in short the Turks did nothing in WW2, the small political acts they made during the war were only in there own best intrest and 'none' else.

alexhaas Says:

May 25, 2008 - hmm my history teacher and my science teacher told me the turks were very strong at the time. but I think they only faught Galapolli right?

CCCPSoviet1917 Says:

May 26, 2008 - Thats WWI again.

bhshootingstar Says:

Jun 7, 2008 - Awesome video!Is Yogoslabia the only country in mainland Europe to carry on anti-nazi guerrila war? What a courage these people have!

PrUnEJuIcEtHeThIrD Says:

Jun 11, 2008 - Very nice. Many chapters of WWII are underrated and overshadowed; the Balkan campaign would be one of them. Also, Yugoslavia has my respect.

K181800 Says:

Jun 23, 2008 - Author of this video,do not know some crucial facts.Tito and majority of resistance movement were Croats!And they were first organized resistance movement in Europe.Ustashe fought for independent Croatia,and they fought against Tito,against communists,but they were Croats as well.The subject is embroiled much more then it looks like.Nothing is black and white,but it seems many things and facts in this video are presented on that whey."The king Peter",ruled with tyranny,Croats didn't like him.

sugarpuddin88 Says:

Jun 29, 2008 - Whose going to fix my broken Yugo automobile?!Oh there's that fat effeminate GoeringRussia and Norway were Hitler's obsessive preoccupations

GDHouston Says:

Jun 29, 2008 - I would normally delete this but thats funny!

mihaimarinescu88 Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - the theory regarding the fact that the balkan campaign interfered fatally with op. Barbarossa is false. the spring of 1941, in Russia, was extremely wet, with heavy rains, resulting in roads filled with great amount of mud, morasses (Russia did not have a developed infrastructure with solid roads), which would have greatly crippled German mobility. They would not have advanced as they did in 1941. They comenced the invasion at the perfect time. decisions along the way caused defeat.

mihaimarinescu88 Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - of course, we should also consider the fact that op Barbarossa in itself was a bad idea. The Germans could have conquered Russia in a different manner. An invasion through Caucaz, to seize the oil reserves would have destroyed any hopes for the soviets. also, if Hitler and OKH would have payed more attention to Africa and give it enough troops to take the Suez channel, thus gaining control of the Middle East and driving the British out of the Mediteranium, well that would have been total victory

GDHouston Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - The theory that it delayed Barborrsa is completely true. And I think you just argued against youself. The road system was terrible a few extra weeks would have helped.

mihaimarinescu88 Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - not a few weeks. a single, clear objective. Hitler had 3- Kiev, Leningrad and Moscow. impossible to achieve on such a vast territory. and that theory is false, because, like i said, a wet spring, causing bad terrain would have been a great cripple to the blitzkrieg. more or less, it would have had the same result as the hostile autumn and then winter weather had before the battle of Moscow. (except for the freezing part, of course)

GDHouston Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - Impossible in war is not impossible. The delay in invading USSR probably was one of a few factors that cost them meeting all or most of their objectives during the first offensive.

mihaimarinescu88 Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - it is clear we won't reach a mutual conclusion, so i said what i believe. and still, there are things that even in war are impossible..

GDHouston Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - probably not lol

liquidgrave Says:

Jul 6, 2008 - any videos focused on greece campaign and resistence?